Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

More nudie scanners in the US

Friday, March 5th, 2010

There are already machines at Boston’s Logan International Airport and next week at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago.

In the next few months, the scanners will be put in at Fort Lauderdale, Fla.; San Jose, Calif.; Columbus, Ohio; San Diego; Charlotte, N.C.; Cincinnati; Los Angeles; Oakland, Calif.; and Kansas City.

Next time you want some TSA agent looking at naked pictures of you, your spouse, and your kids, you know where to go!

As a reminder of what the scans show, check out the prior post on body scanners.

Major employment improvement under Obama

Friday, February 19th, 2010


Someone show me the counter-argument to this compelling graph, please.

Heathrow requires naked pictures to fly

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Original title: “Flying: now with more nudity”

If you want to get on a plane in London, you have to let the government take nude video of you, your spouse and your children.

Flying is far less dangerous than driving. Flying in the nineties and noughties is less dangerous than flying in the seventies and eighties.

Then, of course, there’s the fact that nudie scanners don’t detect bomb parts, anyway.

I hope at least that TSA, flight attendants, pilots, and other people working in secure area of terminal are required to be nudie-scanned every time they come into their workplace. After all, it would be very easy to bring a bomb in as a quickie-mart clerk and hand it off to a passenger.

Of course, that’s disingenuous. I do hope that they’re required to be scanned, because rules should apply to everyone; that’s how we recognize the idiotic nature of rules like this one.

Let me repeat all of that; it’s important:

  • nude video is taken of ALL travellers through Heathrow
  • flying is much safer than driving
  • flying is safer now than it was 20 years ago
  • nudie scanners don’t work, anyway

I should point out that nudie scanners are also called millimeter scanners or terahertz scanners. I think nudie scanner more accurately conveys what they do, though.

Obama’s review team clears 1/3 of Guantanamo detainees

Monday, September 28th, 2009

The administrative team has cleared 75 of the remaining 223 prisoners in Guantanamo for release.

It’s nice to see this train wreck winding down.  Of course, I’m assuming two things:

  • the team is doing a good job of determining whether the detainee could actually be charged
  • we haven’t turned the detainees into terrorists by treating them like an evil empire

The first is a matter of doing due diligence.  (Made more difficult, of course, by trying to figure things out after holding them without charge for as much 8 years, leaving any evidence stale.)

The second is just the price we pay for playing word games with POW versus criminal while ignoring the intent of the law regarding either.

Common sense in the legislature

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

No, really!

Sign up to show your support for a bill requiring all US federal legislation to be posted on the internet for all to see 72 hours prior to a vote.

What a simple, great idea!  Is this really from a Congressman?

Bail out tragedy

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

Above is Barry Ritholz’s way of visualizing the scale of the bail-out.
On the left, the bail-out. On the right, every previous major government plan, combined.

The bail-out is one of those things I shy away from thinking about, like remembering some gruesome auto accident.

I believe something needed to be done to aid the credit system after the collapse, but the bail-out was the wrong thing, and the amount spent defies all logic.

Read Barry Ritholz’s article on the bail-out. However, Barry estimates the cost of the bail-out at $15 trillion, but this NY Times article points out that $12.5 trillion are commited, but “only” $2.5 trillion are spent so far.

My way of thinking about the scale of the bail-out is that $1 trillion is $3,000 for every man, woman and child in the US. That’s right, if you have a family of 5, instead of the $2.5 trillion spent so far on the bail-out, the federal government could have given you $37,500. If they pay out the full $12.5 trillion, that figure would be $187,500.

Instead, they concentrated all that money in the hands of big banks, and what the banks did to “deserve” that money is to utterly mishandle the money they already had.

How will we ever pay this back?

Terrorism makes most people stupid

Tuesday, October 21st, 2008


Don’t be most people.

Sage advice

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

Thanks, someecards!

Which veep sucks least?

Sunday, August 24th, 2008

The Guardian did an inciteful analysis of the obvious candidates for US VP, for both parties.

excerpts:
Pros: Youthful energy signals a change from old corrupt politics to new corrupt politics;

Pros: Least likely to die over the next four to eight years; zeal for castration and exorcism meshes nicely with party’s innovative 12th century social policy.

(Yes, I know how to spell insightful.)

Do-It-Yourself Impeachment

Monday, June 19th, 2006

free html hit counterIf you think your elected officials are letting you down, give ‘em the boot! Check out this online movement to impeach Bush.